Evan is a
| Q (Critical AI) & A Technical Pedagogy How do you define technical talent in relation to traditional violin teaching? Answer: Who is this book intended for? This book is for those who feel that they have technical problems and are prepared to question what they are taught. It is not intended for students and teachers who have success. At what stage of technical development is this book most relevant? Answer: How can the main idea of the book be explained in plain language? Answer: What is a “timeline” in violin technique, and how does it work? Answer: Every violin technique takes time to execute, this means that every technique can be placed into a timeline where something must be done before a predictable result is obtained. For instance, it is logical for a note to be already tuned before the audience hears it, not tuned after they hear it. It is not logical to bow a new note while the left hand finger is still in the air. A timeline uses causal logic to fill in the missing gaps. How does the timeline define coordination and intonation at advanced levels? Answer: Is this difficult to do in practical terms? Answer: No, it is a technique of the mind. This is a bit abstract, however, the mind has stunning abilities and teaching the mind how to think as a violinist creates techniques that cannot be achieved by practice alone. |
Does the book offer a shortcut to practice, or to learning? Not to practice, but a shortcut to pedagogy because essentially, there are two problems with standard violin pedagogy. What are the two problems of traditional violin pedagogy that this book addresses? The first problem is that traditional pedagogy is historical pedagogy of the 1800's. This is when the great violinists wrote their famous violin etudes. Teaching in those times was by demonstration and the etudes taught technique by assimilation through practice. Rather like osmosis teaching. This is a problem for students who learn things differently. The second problem is beginner methods. For instance: Marked fingerboards train students to look instead of listen. At diploma levels this builds an incorrect foundation because strings do not stay in tune and in higher positions, the width of a finger can rotate over two notes. Another problem is using rubber ducks to teach a bow hold. This teaches the opposite of learning the sensations of the bow. If traditional teaching produces great violinists, why is this book needed? Answer: How is this approach different from a personal teaching philosophy or theory of talent? Answer: How does this book relate to traditional Conservatorium training and established teaching methods? Answer: How should the effectiveness of this book be measured? Answer: |